If you haven't seen the cover of the latest issue of Rolling Stone yet, you live in a freakin cave and really need more sunlight in your life. Also, it's posted right below. Look at it, then read on.
I hate the fact I'm even writing this post right now, because with stupid stuff like this (i.e. Amanda Bynes) that is clearly done for publicity, I ignore it because that stuff pisses me off. But the fact Rolling Stone had the grapefruits to put this doucheknuckle on the mother freakin' cover of their magazine is a God d**n disgrace.
Hi, I'm Rolling Stone, let's glorify the crap out of some sucknugget terrorist who caused such a tragic situation at a major, worldwide event just so we can sell a few more issues. Here's an idea you huge sacks of suck -- you wanna do a story on the Bomber, fine. Why don't you put a picture of the scene on? Better yet, why don't you do a damn article on how as a city (both directly inside the borderlines and outside surrounding areas), we were Boston Freakin' Strong and BOUNCED BACK from devastation?
Why not put pictures and stories of the hundreds of people who put their well-being aside to help complete strangers whose legs were blown off or put their freakin FINGERS AROUND AN ARTERY TO PREVENT SOMEONE FROM BLEEDING OUT?!
That's the problem with media these days -- we glorify the negative and pass over the positive. I say screw that. Big shout to CVS and Roche Bros. for boycotting the magazine and refusing to sell it. Here's hoping every other store that has this issue in stock decides to throw them in a pile, light 'em up to start a bonfire, and let every freakin Bostonian pee on the ashes.
That said, I'm officially off my soapbox. But how do YOU feel? Vote in the poll below.